The transaction, and the asset underneath it.
Two practices in one firm. M&A Advisory takes companies to market, raises debt and equity, and originates acquisitions against a written mandate. Technology & AI reads the engineering, data, and security in a target before the money moves, then takes the CTO, CISO, or CAIO seat while the plan runs.
Two Practices
Two practices, hired separately.
Crescent Capital Advisors runs two practices, M&A Advisory and Technology & AI. Each is scoped and engaged on its own terms, and most clients arrive needing one of them.
For investors, owners, and boards approaching a transaction
M&A Advisory
Partner-led M&A for the middle market, run on a national network of private equity funds, independent sponsors, and family offices built over decades. The senior advisor who takes the brief is the one who works the mandate.
- Buy-side search against a written mandate: sector, size, geography, timeline
- Sell-side advisory, positioning and process through to close
- Capital raising across debt and equity for growth, acquisitions, and recapitalizations
- Outsourced business development into PE-backed portfolios, from value proposition to warm introduction
For deal teams, operating partners, and portfolio company boards
Technology & AI
The technology in a target, read before the money moves, by an operator who ran engineering, security, and IT through a full hold and exit. Then the same person takes a seat and runs what the read says needs running. Every finding carries a number and a window, because a deal team cannot act on an adjective.
- PRISM™ due diligence: what gates the deal, what moves price, what threatens the thesis, and what is a lever
- CLEAR™ across the hold, sequenced against the value creation plan rather than worked as a backlog
- AI value creation, cost, and attribution: allocate the spend, recover the waste, then prove the return
- AI governance and the control plane it runs on, built to hold up under a buyer’s questions
- Fractional CTO, CISO, CAIO, or CDO in the seat, accountable to the board and to the number
Why both sit in one firm
Hire either one alone and nothing breaks. What one firm adds shows up at the handoff: the people who sourced the asset already know the mandate the technology read has to answer, and the operator writing that read can be in the room the same week. Two firms who have never spoken cost you a re-brief at the point in a process where there is least time for one.
Inside Technology & AI
Three phases. One operating partner.
Assess - Technology Due Diligence
At acquisition and throughout the hold
- Technology due diligence (PRISM™)
- Cybersecurity pre-close assessment
- AI & data readiness assessment
- 100-day technology roadmap
Risk contained. No surprises. Deal thesis protected.
Improve & Lead - Hold Period Value Creation
Months 3 to 36
- Operating platform & ERP modernization
- AI value creation & deployment
- Cloud & infrastructure optimization
- Fractional CTO / CISO / CAIO / CDO leadership
EBITDA moves. Portfolio visibility improves. Multiple expands.
Exit - Sell-Side Technology Diligence
12–18 months pre-exit
- Sell-side technology diligence
- Technology equity story & AI narrative
- Buyer readiness & data room prep
- Management team Q&A coaching
Exit on your terms. Multiple defended. Clean close.
Frameworks
Named frameworks, versioned.
These belong to the Technology & AI practice and are published in full, so a read you are handed can be checked against the method that produced it.
AI Cost Optimization Framework
v1.2A six-layer model of AI spend (API, infrastructure, tooling, people, waste, risk) that uses governance as the detection layer. Three of the six layers carry 55 percent of spend and are the least visible; working all six recovers 20 to 34 percent of AI spend in the first year.
AI Governance Program
v1.1The engagement that runs between the diagnostic and the target architecture: five phases that take a portfolio company from unlisted AI systems to a board-ready, regulator-ready governance posture.
AI Operating System
v0.9One GP-level engagement that every current and future portfolio company inherits. Governance, readiness, and a repeatable deployment playbook: portfolio AI as operating capacity, not per-portco pilots.
AI Value Attribution Framework
v1.0A five-level measurement hierarchy (Cost, Adoption, Productivity, Business Outcomes, Enterprise Value) for verifying what AI investment produced. Most companies can evidence the first two levels and report as though they had evidenced the last two.
AI Value Creation Framework
v1.1Turning AI from a cost and distraction into a measurable margin driver. Use case prioritization, governance, and a board-ready AI narrative: all tied to EBITDA, not pilots.
CLEAR™ — Hold Period Operating Framework
v2.0Five phases ending at exit, matching fund economics. PRISM™ diagnoses the asset; CLEAR™ operates it.
Enterprise AI Control Plane
v1.3A unified governance architecture (5 pillars × 4 lifecycle stages = 20 control domains) that treats AI systems as enterprise operational infrastructure requiring identity, access, observability, and resilience controls.
PRISM™ — Technology Due Diligence Framework
v1.2Five dimensions scored 0–100. Every finding priced as CapEx requirement, EBITDA drag, or exit multiple implication. A financial instrument, not a checklist.
Representative Outcomes
What we have already done.
Technology & AI, one PE-backed analytics platform across a large-cap firm’s hold period. M&A Advisory mandates and the companies inside them are not published here.
Platform Growth
120x revenue growth
Services-to-SaaS transformation
Engineering Leadership
120-person org
Full technology org scope
Cybersecurity
Org-wide SOC 2 Type II
All 6 business functions
Cloud & Infrastructure
60% cost reduction
At petabyte scale
Operational Efficiency
3 months → 8 hours
Onboarding compression
AI & Engineering
30% productivity gain
Engineering modernization
M&A Execution
Multiple transactions
25% post-integration improvement
Patents
2 US patents
Named inventor, AI/ML
How We Deliver
One lead. A vetted bench.
The Named Lead
Sujit Maharana
Managing Director, Technology & AI Advisory
Tech Due Diligence · Fractional CTO/CISO · AI & Data Transformation
Leads the Technology & AI practice at Crescent Capital Advisors and acts as the technology operating partner for private equity clients across the investment lifecycle. Previously led a full technology organization (engineering, security, IT, and operations) through a complete PE hold period and exit, including multiple transactions and an org-wide SOC 2 Type II certification. CISO and VP Product Engineering at Veekrypt.
The Specialist Bench
Behind the lead sits a vetted bench of senior specialists (security and compliance, OT/ICS, data and analytics, manufacturing operations, AI/ML engineering, M&A integration) engaged per scope, under CCA leadership.
They are operators currently in seat at operating companies, not career consultants between engagements. That is why there is no headshot grid here, and why the read you get reflects how these systems are run today.
One Accountable Lead
Technology & AI engagements are led personally by Sujit: one person owns the read, the plan, and the outcome. M&A Advisory mandates are partner-led from the brief through to close by the senior advisor who took them. Specialists extend either one. They never dilute the accountability.
Tools
Featured tools.
Start with the Enterprise Debt Index, then price and score what it surfaces: a few minutes each, built from our engagement frameworks.
Live · self-serve
Enterprise Debt Index
Which pre-existing debt (data, technology, process, or talent) is your binding constraint on AI.
Run the diagnosticLive · self-serve
AI Governance Quick Scan
A five-minute read on where AI governance holds and where it does not, across five pillars.
Run the diagnosticLive · self-serve
PRISM Scorecard
Where technology protects or erodes enterprise value, scored the way a diligence room will.
Run the diagnosticRecent Thinking
From the operators doing the work.
July 25, 2026
Why Do CEOs See AI Value but Can't Scale It?
Nearly nine in ten CEOs now see AI value, but only in targeted pockets. New BCG data points to the organization underneath the AI as the real blocker on scale.
July 22, 2026
How Much Does an AI Audit Cost?
The honest answer is that AI audit covers three different things at three very different price points, and the cost is set almost entirely by scope: how many AI systems you run, how ready your evidence is, and which standard you're measured against. Before you price an audit, the cheaper move is to find out whether you need one.
July 19, 2026
AI Governance Assessment vs. AI Audit: What a PE-Backed Company Actually Needs
Three different things get called an AI audit. A self-assessment tells you where you stand, a third-party audit gives an outsider's attestation, and a regulator-required conformity assessment is a legal obligation. A PE-backed company usually needs them in that order, and rarely needs the last one as early as it fears.
Newsletter
The Portco Brief
A short brief for PE operating and deal teams: how technology is moving the multiple, read in five minutes. New issue most weeks, no filler.
Start with what you own, or what you are trying to buy.
A mandate you are ready to run, a target under LOI, a company you are getting ready to sell, or a portfolio stack that keeps showing up in board decks. Say which one, and we will tell you which practice fits and what the first piece of work would be.
